Difference between revisions of "Group Log"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''March 17th 6:00pm''': Resources about Web 2.0, a powerpoint by Jim Cuene <br> | '''March 17th 6:00pm''': Resources about Web 2.0, a powerpoint by Jim Cuene <br> | ||
'''March 17th 9:30pm''': Resources about Creative Commons | '''March 17th 9:30pm''': Resources about Creative Commons <br> | ||
'''Article on Intellectual Property problems caused by Web 2.0[[http://br.sys-con.com/read/190346_2.htm]]'''<br> | '''Article on Intellectual Property problems caused by Web 2.0[[http://br.sys-con.com/read/190346_2.htm]]'''<br> | ||
'''Mail to lecturer''': Hey Guys, when I started searching for information and looking at other scenarios, I realised that it would be better if we concentrate only on intellectual property, because we have to know our topic intensively and I think if we take open source and open content into consideration, that would be impossible. That's why I think it will be better for us to concentrate on intellecutal property only, but ofcourse we will ran into open source and open content, than we can use those two in our scenario, but concentrate more extensively on the future of intellectual property. <br> | '''Mail to lecturer''': Hey Guys, when I started searching for information and looking at other scenarios, I realised that it would be better if we concentrate only on intellectual property, because we have to know our topic intensively and I think if we take open source and open content into consideration, that would be impossible. That's why I think it will be better for us to concentrate on intellecutal property only, but ofcourse we will ran into open source and open content, than we can use those two in our scenario, but concentrate more extensively on the future of intellectual property. <br> | ||
I think that this is also the meaning of the professor, think he wants us to concentrate more on intellectual property. But I just mailed him about this issue, but he has not answer yet. <br> | I think that this is also the meaning of the professor, think he wants us to concentrate more on intellectual property. But I just mailed him about this issue, but he has not answer yet. <br> | ||
'''What do you guys think about this?''' | '''What do you guys think about this?''' | ||
Revision as of 19:51, 18 March 2006
March 17th 6:00pm: Resources about Web 2.0, a powerpoint by Jim Cuene
March 17th 9:30pm: Resources about Creative Commons
Article on Intellectual Property problems caused by Web 2.0[[1]]
Mail to lecturer: Hey Guys, when I started searching for information and looking at other scenarios, I realised that it would be better if we concentrate only on intellectual property, because we have to know our topic intensively and I think if we take open source and open content into consideration, that would be impossible. That's why I think it will be better for us to concentrate on intellecutal property only, but ofcourse we will ran into open source and open content, than we can use those two in our scenario, but concentrate more extensively on the future of intellectual property.
I think that this is also the meaning of the professor, think he wants us to concentrate more on intellectual property. But I just mailed him about this issue, but he has not answer yet.
What do you guys think about this?