Difference between revisions of "RSM EMBA 2009 Scenarios"
Mvanderzwan (talk | contribs) |
|||
(176 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Scenarios= | =Scenarios= | ||
[[The Future of Hospitals in Amsterdam in 2020]] | |||
[[The Future of R&D in Pharmaceutical Industry in 2025]] | [[The Future of R&D in Pharmaceutical Industry in 2025]] | ||
The Future of the | |||
[[The Future of Corporate Websites in Europe 2015]] | |||
[[The Future of Maritime trade in 2020 and the implications for the port of Amsterdam]] | |||
[[Oil Production 2030]] | |||
=EMBA 2009 FINAL PRESENTATIONS= | |||
Friday November 6, 2009 from 17.00 - 21.00<br><br> | |||
The DTN, Prinsengracht 707, 1017 JW Amsterdam | |||
=Will attend= | |||
Peter Hoppesteyn<br> | |||
Jetske Tamboezer<br> | |||
Ruth Donners (no alcohol, no pork meat)<br> | |||
Michael Aouad <br> | |||
Marjoleine van der Zwan<br> | |||
Miranda Tjiang<br> | |||
Roel Kock (shoarma pizza... )<br> | |||
Shirley Yuen <br> | |||
Seda Demircioglu <br> | |||
Daniel Peters (deep pan pizza)<br> | |||
Mirjam Terhorst (only 1-1.5 hrs, no pizza)<br> | |||
Mihai Andreoiu<br> | |||
David Verberne (Normal pizza,quattro stagioni)<br> | |||
Andreas Schuil <br> | |||
Phil Poetter <br> | |||
Murat Akguc (no food + will join around 17:45)<br> | |||
= Will not attend= | |||
Rosalie Kuyvenhoven <br> | |||
Maria Marcos <br> | |||
Eduard de Visser <br> | |||
Peter Friedl <br> | |||
Jose Nunes <br> | |||
=Guest Speaker= | |||
Former Shell Netherlands CEO, and Senator Rein Willems presented his personal perspectives on the use of scenarios in Shell over the last two decades. [[Media: ShellScenarioReflection.PPT]] | |||
=Evaluation= | =Evaluation= | ||
Line 9: | Line 48: | ||
10% Class participation (virtual and physical) <br> | 10% Class participation (virtual and physical) <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== | ==Final Scenario Evaluation Criteria== | ||
Based on the full time MBA viewing of the existing scenarios, please add to this list as you see fit.<br> | |||
* Scenarios will be considered to be of high quality if they contain the following:<br> | |||
of | * Solid assumptions and data reasoning <br> | ||
that | * Rich, thought-provoking ideas <br> | ||
* Beyond the obvious, assumption breaking ideas <br> | |||
* Scenarios that are linked to driving forces/factors<br> | |||
* Scenarios, driving factors, and ideas that are relevant to the issue (and related stakeholders)<br> | |||
* Scenarios with clear names<br> | |||
* Logical flow with visual representations of the thought process <br> | |||
* Plausible scenarios<br> | |||
* Balanced scenarios (1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4)--all of the scenarios should be equally likely<br> | |||
* Surprising scenarios<br> | |||
* Detailed stories that enable the reader to follow the logic of the thought process<br> | |||
* Conclusive within themselves<br> | |||
Short movie on numbers that matter | |||
==Driving Forces== | ==Driving Forces== | ||
Line 20: | Line 70: | ||
==Learning Log== | ==Learning Log== | ||
Make a map of your learning process by picking variables | Make a map of your learning process by picking variables <br> | ||
group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural | group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural<br> | ||
personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty | personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty <br> | ||
content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited, | content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited, <br> | ||
learning: key learning moments, insights<p> | learning: key learning moments, insights<p> | ||
Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course | Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course <br> | ||
===Learning Maps=== | ===Learning Maps=== | ||
Seda Demircioglu<br> | Seda Demircioglu<br> | ||
Ruth Donners<br> | |||
Maria Marcos<br> | |||
Phil Poetter<br> | |||
Jetske Tamboezer<br> | |||
Daniel Peters<br> | |||
Joost d'Hooghe<br> | |||
Peter Hoppesteyn<br> | |||
Eduard de Visser<br> | |||
David Verberne<br> | |||
===Learning Essays=== | ===Learning Essays=== | ||
Rosalie Kuyvenhoven<br> | |||
Murat Akguc<br> |
Latest revision as of 11:56, 20 August 2010
Scenarios
The Future of Hospitals in Amsterdam in 2020
The Future of R&D in Pharmaceutical Industry in 2025
The Future of Corporate Websites in Europe 2015
The Future of Maritime trade in 2020 and the implications for the port of Amsterdam
EMBA 2009 FINAL PRESENTATIONS
Friday November 6, 2009 from 17.00 - 21.00
The DTN, Prinsengracht 707, 1017 JW Amsterdam
Will attend
Peter Hoppesteyn
Jetske Tamboezer
Ruth Donners (no alcohol, no pork meat)
Michael Aouad
Marjoleine van der Zwan
Miranda Tjiang
Roel Kock (shoarma pizza... )
Shirley Yuen
Seda Demircioglu
Daniel Peters (deep pan pizza)
Mirjam Terhorst (only 1-1.5 hrs, no pizza)
Mihai Andreoiu
David Verberne (Normal pizza,quattro stagioni)
Andreas Schuil
Phil Poetter
Murat Akguc (no food + will join around 17:45)
Will not attend
Rosalie Kuyvenhoven
Maria Marcos
Eduard de Visser
Peter Friedl
Jose Nunes
Guest Speaker
Former Shell Netherlands CEO, and Senator Rein Willems presented his personal perspectives on the use of scenarios in Shell over the last two decades. Media: ShellScenarioReflection.PPT
Evaluation
50% Group work (final scenarios)
40% Individual work (survey, learning log, driving forces, strategic challenge)
10% Class participation (virtual and physical)
Final Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Based on the full time MBA viewing of the existing scenarios, please add to this list as you see fit.
- Scenarios will be considered to be of high quality if they contain the following:
- Solid assumptions and data reasoning
- Rich, thought-provoking ideas
- Beyond the obvious, assumption breaking ideas
- Scenarios that are linked to driving forces/factors
- Scenarios, driving factors, and ideas that are relevant to the issue (and related stakeholders)
- Scenarios with clear names
- Logical flow with visual representations of the thought process
- Plausible scenarios
- Balanced scenarios (1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4)--all of the scenarios should be equally likely
- Surprising scenarios
- Detailed stories that enable the reader to follow the logic of the thought process
- Conclusive within themselves
Short movie on numbers that matter
Driving Forces
As an individual define 2 driving forces and improve 2 driving forces in the Driving Forces section
Learning Log
Make a map of your learning process by picking variables
group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural
personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty
content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited,
learning: key learning moments, insights
Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course
Learning Maps
Seda Demircioglu
Ruth Donners
Maria Marcos
Phil Poetter
Jetske Tamboezer
Daniel Peters
Joost d'Hooghe
Peter Hoppesteyn
Eduard de Visser
David Verberne
Learning Essays
Rosalie Kuyvenhoven
Murat Akguc