Difference between revisions of "Paid for dailies VS Free dailies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Enablers== | ==Enablers== | ||
# | # Students and poor people prefers Free dailies. | ||
# | # Quality papers can attract more customers to the paid dailies market. | ||
# | # More people willing to pay while in good economic times. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Paradigms== | ==Paradigms== | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:01, 25 May 2009
Author
Andrew Li
Description
After 400 years of cover-price revenue model, free titles are surging into the paid-for market. Influenced by the pervasive expectation of the free news on the internet, newspaper readers have high expectation of free newspapers. But some enterprises argue that cover prices must be maximized, increase in prices will not always result in a parallel drop in sales, and therefore the overall revenue will increase. And some also argue that high cover price stand for high value. It is worth for customers to pay the price. Which business model will be the next standard for the newspaper industry?
Enablers
- Students and poor people prefers Free dailies.
- Quality papers can attract more customers to the paid dailies market.
- More people willing to pay while in good economic times.
Inhibitors
Paradigms
Web Resource
http://www.wan-press.org/IMG/pdf/Pages_de_SFN5.6Pricing_light.pdf
http://www.wan-press.org/IMG/pdf/executiveSFN_6.1.pdf