Difference between revisions of "Scenario 4: Lazy Donkey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amaranthac (talk | contribs) m |
Amaranthac (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Introduction=== | |||
In this scenario, the usage of location based services is low and the variety of location based services offered is also low. Location based services are therefore not very popular or widespread. We will now take a look at the events that have led to this situation and the forces that were driving this development. The following unordered driving forces have all contributed to the occurence of this scenario: | In this scenario, the usage of location based services is low and the variety of location based services offered is also low. Location based services are therefore not very popular or widespread. We will now take a look at the events that have led to this situation and the forces that were driving this development. The following unordered driving forces have all contributed to the occurence of this scenario: | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
===Current situation(2011)=== | ===Current situation(2011)=== | ||
===2006=== | |||
===2007=== | |||
===2008=== | |||
===2009=== | |||
===2010=== | |||
Revision as of 23:06, 6 May 2006
Introduction
In this scenario, the usage of location based services is low and the variety of location based services offered is also low. Location based services are therefore not very popular or widespread. We will now take a look at the events that have led to this situation and the forces that were driving this development. The following unordered driving forces have all contributed to the occurence of this scenario:
- Space pollution
- Global Warming
- Fossil fuel consumption
- Renewable sources of energy
- Interest of users
- Health impact of mobile and wireless devices
- Quality of information
- Increasing Mobility
- Growing privacy and security concerns
- War on terror
- Regulations and telecom privacy
- Advanced high tech mobile devices
- Willingness to pay for information