Difference between revisions of "In the future, will it still be necessary to have teachers? What are the consequences of not having teachers? Can there be a replacement for the teacher?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Answer for [[ Questions & Answers for the future of Secondary Education in 2020]]''<br> | |||
<br> | |||
The teacher will be always necessary in the secondary education. He is the one who supervises advices, motivates, inspires and guides the pupils. In that age children need to have a teacher, and there is no way to be replaced by a machine. The consequences of not having teacher would be dramatic. Actually there would be no secondary education without them. A kind of virtual teacher could be possibly used in tertiary education and specifically in distance learning environments. | The teacher will be always necessary in the secondary education. He is the one who supervises advices, motivates, inspires and guides the pupils. In that age children need to have a teacher, and there is no way to be replaced by a machine. The consequences of not having teacher would be dramatic. Actually there would be no secondary education without them. A kind of virtual teacher could be possibly used in tertiary education and specifically in distance learning environments. |
Latest revision as of 21:09, 19 March 2007
Answer for Questions & Answers for the future of Secondary Education in 2020
The teacher will be always necessary in the secondary education. He is the one who supervises advices, motivates, inspires and guides the pupils. In that age children need to have a teacher, and there is no way to be replaced by a machine. The consequences of not having teacher would be dramatic. Actually there would be no secondary education without them. A kind of virtual teacher could be possibly used in tertiary education and specifically in distance learning environments.