Difference between revisions of "5. Is the Mobility(60km/h) enough?"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:


'''Product Differentiation between DMB & WCDMA & Wibro'''
'''Product Differentiation between DMB & WCDMA & Wibro'''
[[Image:Product_Differentiation_DMB_WCDMA_Wibro.JPG]]
[[Image:Product_Differentiation_DMB_WCDMA_Wibro.JPG]]


[[Image:WiBro_W-CDMA_Product Differentiation.JPG]]
[[Image:WiBro_W-CDMA_Product Differentiation.JPG]]

Revision as of 06:51, 17 July 2006

The user's selection of services used to be based on the data-rate, mobility and coverage. But these kind of preferences are the choices of each individual preference. All user, of course, want the higher data-rate, more powerful mobility and wider coverage. But there are the trade-off in Wireless Service. It is difficule for the mobility and data-rate to coexist at once. Because of this "trade-off" in wireless service, there are product differentiation.


The Ficure of Wibro and W-CDMA shows the product differentiation; Wibro is following up the data-rate service position, W-CDMA is the mobility service position. For each service position wants the fitting CAPEX planning for their customers and customers could select their preferences between Wibro & W-CDMA.


So the mobility 60km/h of Wibro could be enough. Because the moto of Wibro at it's first phase is DSL in outdoor.


The Requirements of Wibro Services;

  • Provide the way to use high speed internet service not only in home but also in outdoor → Equivalent data rate to xDSL per user
  • Maximize the usage over the allocated spectrum
  • Maximize the spectral efficiency
  • Extend the service coverage
  • Reduce the cost per bit
  • Low power consumption at AT
  • Faster handoff


Product Differentiation between DMB & WCDMA & Wibro


Product Differentiation DMB WCDMA Wibro.JPG

WiBro W-CDMA Product Differentiation.JPG