Power of the United Nations
Revision as of 09:45, 29 May 2010 by 188.92.76.153 (talk) (LSNVTo <a href="http://fnxhgrzwxfiw.com/">fnxhgrzwxfiw</a>, [url=http://tfmrytptgctb.com/]tfmrytptgctb[/url], [link=http://nlvmnwzujhga.com/]nlvmnwzujhga[/link], http://nsvvqdpuhlhz.com/)
This page is being edited by Ruth Donners EMBA09. In case of any questions/remarks contact me.
LSNVTo <a href="http://fnxhgrzwxfiw.com/">fnxhgrzwxfiw</a>, [url=http://tfmrytptgctb.com/]tfmrytptgctb[/url], [link=http://nlvmnwzujhga.com/]nlvmnwzujhga[/link], http://nsvvqdpuhlhz.com/
Enablers:
- Fear for WWIII: World War II was something that no-one wanted to relive a international organization was set up. The name came partly from the one "United Nations Fighting Forces" used during the war by the Allied forces.
- Cold war: We need some sense of security and coorporation
- Rogue Nations and International Terrorism: Iran, North Korea, Iraq, etc. Together we can justify retaliating.
- Globalization
Inhibitors:
- Bureaucracy
- Original charter is (too) old and ineffective now:
- Member state governments: They have the real power:
- Members ignore resolutions
- Members proceed with actions withouth UN support/agreement
- Local memberstate laws and regulations
Paradigms:
- Before: Attacking one country was a simple cost benefit analysis.
- After: Attacking one country now involved waging war against all the UN members.
Timing:
After the catastrophes of WWII.
"I don't know what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
Experts:
To be added