Difference between revisions of "Political Stability in Europe"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Description:==
==Description:==


We can see that political factors have also been of fundamental importance in this ongoing enlargement process. Independent of the economic benefits of accession or enlargement (depending on whether one is a candidate or an existing member) there is certainly a strong case to be made for promoting the notion of the political stability that membership invariably brings – although in some cases this may be merely the displacement of a previous area of instability to a position beyond the ‘new border’ – as an increasingly significant driving force in the enlargement process. Not only does this however relate to the desire for what can now be termed ‘soft security insurance’ on the part of prospective members, but also to what we may term, the EU’s ‘wider civic duty’ to admit all those that pass the ‘entrance exam’ essentially laid down by the ‘Copenhagen Criteria’. This point is again often couched within the context of the desire for politico-administrative ‘lockin’ on the part of the potential new Member States. Moreover, it is also perceived as a dynamic issue, as the failure to ‘project’ stability is seen as merely an invitation to ‘import’ instability. As such, this point relates in particular to the broad acknowledgement of the significant changes that have occurred at the global political level since the end of the Cold War, and in particular to the realisation that the process of European integration has a fundamental impact - with the potential to be either good or bad – upon the EUs
Political factors have been of fundamental importance in this ongoing enlargement process and to the foundation of the European Union. Independent of the economic benefits of accession or enlargement (depending on whether one is a candidate or an existing member) there is certainly a strong case to be made for promoting the notion of the political stability that membership invariably brings – although in some cases this may be merely the displacement of a previous area of instability to a position beyond the ‘new border’ – as an increasingly significant driving force in the enlargement process. Not only does this however relate to the desire for what can now be termed ‘soft security insurance’ on the part of prospective members, but also to what we may term, the EU’s ‘wider civic duty’ to admit all those that pass the ‘entrance exam’ essentially laid down by the ‘Copenhagen Criteria’. This point is again often couched within the context of the desire for politico-administrative ‘lockin’ on the part of the potential new Member States. Moreover, it is also perceived as a dynamic issue, as the failure to ‘project’ stability is seen as merely an invitation to ‘import’ instability. As such, this point relates in particular to the broad acknowledgement of the significant changes that have occurred at the global political level since the end of the Cold War, and in particular to the realisation that the process of European integration has a fundamental impact - with the potential to be either good or bad – upon the EUs neighbouring states.
neighbouring states.


The objectives of xxxx:
The objectives of xxxx:

Revision as of 10:16, 17 September 2009

Future of the European Union in 2030

Description:

Political factors have been of fundamental importance in this ongoing enlargement process and to the foundation of the European Union. Independent of the economic benefits of accession or enlargement (depending on whether one is a candidate or an existing member) there is certainly a strong case to be made for promoting the notion of the political stability that membership invariably brings – although in some cases this may be merely the displacement of a previous area of instability to a position beyond the ‘new border’ – as an increasingly significant driving force in the enlargement process. Not only does this however relate to the desire for what can now be termed ‘soft security insurance’ on the part of prospective members, but also to what we may term, the EU’s ‘wider civic duty’ to admit all those that pass the ‘entrance exam’ essentially laid down by the ‘Copenhagen Criteria’. This point is again often couched within the context of the desire for politico-administrative ‘lockin’ on the part of the potential new Member States. Moreover, it is also perceived as a dynamic issue, as the failure to ‘project’ stability is seen as merely an invitation to ‘import’ instability. As such, this point relates in particular to the broad acknowledgement of the significant changes that have occurred at the global political level since the end of the Cold War, and in particular to the realisation that the process of European integration has a fundamental impact - with the potential to be either good or bad – upon the EUs neighbouring states.

The objectives of xxxx:

  • increased efficiency
  • reduced costs
  • increased quality and tailor-made health care

Enablers:

  1. Aging population
  2. Technological innovations
  3. Developments in ICT
  4. Open markets in health care

Inhibitors:

  1. Too much focus on technology, to little focus on patient. (It works, but does is help the patient?)
  2. A critical mass needs to adopt an innovation
  3. Lack of time, communication and financial resources

Paradigms:

Due to the aging population in The Netherlands the demand for health care will increase. Technological innovations and innovations in ICT can make health care more efficient, cheaper, more patient-friendly and better tailor-made. The open markets in health care make effective implementations of innovations in health care possible.

Experts:

  1. Engineers
  2. ICT specialists
  3. Technological experts
  4. Managers in health care
  5. Health insurance experts
  6. Patient representatives

Web Resources:

Could we imagine other future for Europe?

Retrieved from "https://www.scenariothinking.org/index.php?title=Political_Stability_in_Europe&oldid=28961"