Difference between revisions of "Current Issues in Broadband"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
The applications that will be affected by a speed increase are
The applications that will be affected by a speed increase are


- Downloading
<li> Downloading
- File Sharing
<li> File Sharing
- Streaming radio and TV
<li> Streaming radio and TV
- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_on_demand Video on Demand]
<li> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_on_demand Video on Demand]
- Multiplayer gaming
<li> Multiplayer gaming
- Virtual reality
<li> Virtual reality


'''''* What is the current broadband penetration?'''''
'''''* What is the current broadband penetration?'''''

Revision as of 15:10, 7 June 2006

* What are the current applications using broadband?

eMule is the biggest file sharing network on the Internet with millions of users, but is it legal?

The applications that will be affected by a speed increase are

  • Downloading
  • File Sharing
  • Streaming radio and TV
  • Video on Demand
  • Multiplayer gaming
  • Virtual reality * What is the current broadband penetration? The current broadband penetration in OECD countries (December 2005) is 13.6% of the population. The growth rate of the penetration was 15% in 2005. The top 4 countries are Iceland, Korea, The Netherlands and Denmark with penetration rates over 25%. In real number, the country with the largest amount of subscriber is the USA. The lowest penetration rate is granted to Greece with 1.4%. The EU 15 averages at 14.2% penetration. There is a significant difference in Internet penetration between developed and developing countries. The table shows the estimates of broadband usage per 100 inhabitants and the number of total subscribers in OECD countries.
    Broadband subscribers per 100 inhabitants, by technology, December 2005
    DSL Cable Other Total Rank Total Subscribers
    Iceland 25.9 0.1 0.6 26.7 1 78.017
    Korea 13.6 8.3 3.4 25.4 2 12.190.711
    Netherlands 15.7 9.6 0.0 25.3 3 4.113.573
    Denmark 15.3 7.2 2.5 25.0 4 1.350.415
    Switzerland 14.7 8.0 0.4 23.1 5 1.725.446
    Finland 19.5 2.8 0.1 22.5 6 1.174.200
    Norway 17.8 2.9 1.2 21.9 7 1.006.766
    Canada 10.1 10.8 0.1 21.9 8 6.706.699
    Sweden 13.3 3.4 3.6 20.3 9 1.830.000
    Belgium 11.3 7.0 0.0 18.3 10 1.902.739
    Japan 11.3 2.5 3.8 17.6 11 22.515.091
    United States 6.5 9.0 1.3 16.8 12 49.391.060
    United Kingdom 11.5 4.4 0.0 15.9 13 9.539.900
    France 14.3 0.9 0.0 15.2 14 9.465.600
    Luxembourg 13.3 1.6 0.0 14.9 15 67.357
    Austria 8.1 5.8 0.2 14.1 16 1.155.000
    Australia 10.8 2.6 0.4 13.8 17 2.785.000
    Germany 12.6 0.3 0.1 13.0 18 10.706.600
    Italy 11.3 0.0 0.6 11.9 19 6.896.696
    Spain 9.2 2.5 0.1 11.7 20 4.994.274
    Portugal 6.6 4.9 0.0 11.5 21 1.212.034
    New Zealand 7.3 0.4 0.4 8.1 22 331.000
    Ireland 5.0 0.6 1.1 6.7 23 270.700
    Czech Republic 3.0 1.4 2.0 6.4 24 650.000
    Hungary 4.1 2.1 0.1 6.3 25 639.505
    Slovak Republic 2.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 26 133.900
    Poland 1.6 0.7 0.1 2.4 27 897.659
    Mexico 1.5 0.6 0.0 2.2 28 2.304.520
    Turkey 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 29 1.530.000
    Greece 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 30 155.418
    OECD 8.4 4.2 1.0 13.6 157.719.880



    * who are the main players?

    In each of the separate countries, the national telecom provider is the main player for broadband diffusion, especially for DSL connections. Nevertheless, with the increased penetration of other techniques such as cable, fiber optic, satellite and wireless, new players come into play, often offering broadband internet in a bundle of products (Satellite/ cable TV, telecoms, etc.)


    * what are the main bottlenecks to broadband diffusion?

    Regional disparities, Transition to ‘real’ broadband, Security, Energy Consumption (an internet firewall consumes more energy per household than a clothes dryer),


    * How is the internal rivalry among the main players?

    Broadband players have taken different strategies to gain and retain customers. While phone companies have developed a “pricing strategy” based on high discounts, cable companies have develop a “value service oriented” strategy. For many years phone companies have been challenging cable operators to cut down prices of the services affecting Cable operators revenues. On the other hand cable operators have responded increasing the services. The competition between these two types of companies increased even more when cable companies started to offer telephone service along with television and high-speed Internet service.


    Sources

    OECD Broadband Statistics, December 2005