Difference between revisions of "RSM MBA 2009 Scenarios"
m (→Learning Log) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
As an individual define 2 driving forces and improve 2 driving forces | As an individual define 2 driving forces and improve 2 driving forces | ||
==Learning Log== | ==Learning Log== | ||
Make a map of your learning process by picking variables | Make a map of your learning process by picking variables <br> | ||
group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural | group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural<br> | ||
personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty | personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty <br> | ||
content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited, | content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited, <br> | ||
learning: key learning moments, insights<p> | learning: key learning moments, insights<p> | ||
Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course | Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course | ||
Revision as of 09:23, 10 September 2009
Scenarios
Future of China in 2030
Future of the European Union in 2030
Future of Advertising in 2020
Future of Russia in 2030
Future of Sustainability 2030
Evaluation
50% Group work (final scenarios)
40% Individual work (survey, learning log, driving forces, strategic challenge)
10% Class participation (virtual and physical)
Final Scenario Evaluation Criteria
Scenarios will be considered to be of high quality if they contain the following:
Solid assumptions and data reasoning
Rich, thought-provoking ideas
Beyond the obvious, assumption breaking ideas
Scenarios that are linked to driving forces/factors
Scenarios, driving factors, and ideas that are relevant to the issue (and related stakeholders)
Scenarios with clear names
Logical flow with visual representations of the thought process
Plausible scenarios
Balanced scenarios (1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4)--all of the scenarios should be equally likely
Surprising scenarios
Detailed stories that enable the reader to follow the logic of the thought process
Numbers that Matter
present for 5 minutes as a group a short case based on numerical analysis of an existing popular assumption of the world that will get us to rethink current barriers Challenges to Conventional Wisdom
Driving Forces
As an individual define 2 driving forces and improve 2 driving forces
Learning Log
Make a map of your learning process by picking variables
group process: group roles (interchange), advocacy-listening, who talks the most, cultural
personal development: reflexivity, emotions, difficulty
content: subjective view of possible futures, many/few, divergence/convergence, deductive thinking, inductive thinking, sites visited,
learning: key learning moments, insights
Write a less than 3000 word essay on your learning in the course
Learning Maps
put your name here
Gerrit Ledderhof
Geoff Spielman
Justin Block
Gudmundur Kristjansson
Chihhu Chen
Maggie Zhu
Johanna Little
Hugh Malkin
Vinod Nair
Elsa Sheng
Yojiro Fukaya
Learning Essays
put you name here