Difference between revisions of "Influence of the World Trade Organization (WTO)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | 8xzn0w <a href="http://tatxvfamgonb.com/">tatxvfamgonb</a>, [url=http://mjzxzrfqfmwo.com/]mjzxzrfqfmwo[/url], [link=http://zikmydeagosh.com/]zikmydeagosh[/link], http://vqylenvstsdw.com/ | ||
==Enablers:== | ==Enablers:== | ||
Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
*Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations. | *Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations. | ||
e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes. | e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes. | ||
*Return to protectionist measures as a result of financial downturn. Protectionist measures aimed at national/regional constituencies can threaten the free movement of goods (e.g. by imposing import duties) | |||
*Anti-globalization movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement | |||
==Paradigms:== | ==Paradigms:== | ||
Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
= | MmoPsv <a href="http://lpdehvvcrlqp.com/">lpdehvvcrlqp</a>, [url=http://ltzjpwwolvhi.com/]ltzjpwwolvhi[/url], [link=http://hkhtavypabfz.com/]hkhtavypabfz[/link], http://vovjcheigivb.com/ | ||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 2 May 2010
8xzn0w <a href="http://tatxvfamgonb.com/">tatxvfamgonb</a>, [url=http://mjzxzrfqfmwo.com/]mjzxzrfqfmwo[/url], [link=http://zikmydeagosh.com/]zikmydeagosh[/link], http://vqylenvstsdw.com/
Enablers:
- Good cause: The objectives of the WTO look honourable.
- EU-US trade relationship: Most trade is done between those regions
- Greed:
- Large Multinationals: WTO rules favor large multinationals
- Rich countries: WTO rules favor the richer countries
- Forced membership: Not being a member of WTO severly limits your trade capabilities (embargo)
- Globalization
Inhibitors:
- Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations.
e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes.
- Return to protectionist measures as a result of financial downturn. Protectionist measures aimed at national/regional constituencies can threaten the free movement of goods (e.g. by imposing import duties)
- Anti-globalization movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement
Paradigms:
- Before: International trade was severly limited by local government rules
- After: International trade is easy now because consistent rules are made internationally.
MmoPsv <a href="http://lpdehvvcrlqp.com/">lpdehvvcrlqp</a>, [url=http://ltzjpwwolvhi.com/]ltzjpwwolvhi[/url], [link=http://hkhtavypabfz.com/]hkhtavypabfz[/link], http://vovjcheigivb.com/