Difference between revisions of "Affordability of cyber-warfare"
Gvalaouras (talk | contribs) |
Gvalaouras (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Inhibitors== | ==Inhibitors== | ||
#<b>The need for specialized personnel</b>: A country's cyber-warfare capacity is determined not only by the available technological infrastructure, but by the competence of the personnel that it employs as well. The procedure of finding and acquiring the most talented and highly trained programmers can be difficult, costly and time consuming. | #<b>The need for specialized personnel</b>: A country's cyber-warfare capacity is determined not only by the available technological infrastructure, but by the competence of the personnel that it employs as well. The procedure of finding and acquiring the most talented and highly trained programmers can be difficult, costly and time consuming. | ||
#<b>The obsolescence of technology</b>: While conventional military equipment can have a useful life of many years, the extremely rapid advancements in information technology can make the infrastructure required for cyber-warfare obsolete very quickly. Thus there is a need for constant, and potentialy costly, upgrades to keep up with cutting-edge technology. | |||
==Web Resources== | ==Web Resources== | ||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 19 May 2008
Author
Georgios Valaouras
Description
Nations are becoming increasingly aware that the use of cyber strategies can be a major force multiplier and equaliser.
The federally budgeted military expenditure of the United States Department of Defense for fiscal year 2007 is $439.3 Billion. The US is responsible for 46% of the world total military expenditure, distantly followed by the UK, France, Japan and China with 4%-5% each.
Smaller countries that could never compete in a conventional military sense with their larger neighbours can develop a capability that gives them a strategic advantage, if properly utilised. As a RAND Corporation study pointed out in the mid-1990s, the entry costs for conducting cyber war are extremely modest. Not surprisingly, therefore, countries that are not as dependent on high technology within their military establishment consider such dependence a potential "Achilles heel" for their enemies.
Enablers
- Low cost of required infrastructure: Developing cyber weapons does not require the massive infrastructure usually associated with conventional arms.
Inhibitors
- The need for specialized personnel: A country's cyber-warfare capacity is determined not only by the available technological infrastructure, but by the competence of the personnel that it employs as well. The procedure of finding and acquiring the most talented and highly trained programmers can be difficult, costly and time consuming.
- The obsolescence of technology: While conventional military equipment can have a useful life of many years, the extremely rapid advancements in information technology can make the infrastructure required for cyber-warfare obsolete very quickly. Thus there is a need for constant, and potentialy costly, upgrades to keep up with cutting-edge technology.
Web Resources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp
http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2001/0104-04.htm
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/cat_cyberwarfare.html