Difference between revisions of "Military Spending"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Description:==
m1iJO2  <a href="http://sxeyackuosug.com/">sxeyackuosug</a>, [url=http://cmwyuiuucboa.com/]cmwyuiuucboa[/url], [link=http://ohddhjupxjuf.com/]ohddhjupxjuf[/link], http://obsbskdexebx.com/
After declining in the post-cold war era of the early 1990s, global military spending is on the rise again – threatening to break the one trillion dollar barrier this year, according to a group of UN-appointed military experts. The 16-member group estimates that military spending will rise to nearly $950 billion by the end of 2004, up from $900 billion in 2003. By contrast, rich nations spend $50-60 billion on development aid each year.


==Enablers:==
qeeyrO  <a href="http://vpqunjvtljwb.com/">vpqunjvtljwb</a>, [url=http://lsccwkfiafxp.com/]lsccwkfiafxp[/url], [link=http://pakmvejnpyxf.com/]pakmvejnpyxf[/link], http://pnoigwygjfsc.com/
- Conflict in Afghanistan
- War in Iraq
Concern with global terrorism after the attacks on New York and Washington


==Inhibitors:==
==Inhibitors:==
- Acceptance of other countries.
* European Union: The EU has had an almost flat trend in military spending over the past 10-year period.
- Deals between the countries to limit the military spending
* Major reduction in inter-state conflict
* Deals between the countries to limit the military spending


==Paradigms:==
==Paradigms:==
The main reason for the increase in world military spending is the massive increase in the United States, which accounts for almost half of the world total.... In the absence of [appropriations for the new war on terror, and on Iraq], US military expenditure would still show a significant increase, but at a much slower rate, and world military spending would show a rise of 4 per cent rather than 11 per cent in 2003.
There is a large gap between what countries are prepared to allocate for military means to provide security and maintain their global and regional power status, on the one hand, and to alleviate poverty and promote economic development, on the other.
But it is not just the U.S. military spending. In fact, western militarism often overlaps with civilian functions affecting attitudes to militarism in general. As a result, when revelations come out that some Western militaries may have trained dictators and human rights violators, the justification given may be surprising.
Even at a time when a deep economic recession is causing much turbulence in the civilian world … defense giants  are enjoying a reliable and growing revenue stream from countries eager to increase their military might. In fact many countries have not cut military spending despite the crisis.


==Experts:==
==Experts:==
Jan Oberg
Jan Oberg <br\>
US Department of Justice
US Department of Justice <br\>
United Nations
United Nations


==Timing:==
1WJ90t  <a href="http://zmpnwbktbfnk.com/">zmpnwbktbfnk</a>, [url=http://kabraguykjru.com/]kabraguykjru[/url], [link=http://qrovlpenakrj.com/]qrovlpenakrj[/link], http://mrfktbrihvab.com/
Military spending will only be reduced when a president of the United States comes with peaceful talks. When terrorism is almost negligible and the countries feel secure. I do not see military spending decreasing in the next 5 years. Maybe by 2010 military spending will decrease.


==Web Resources:==
==Web Resources:==
http://www.bt.com.bn/en/analysis/2009/09/13/military-spending-rises-undermines-peace <br\>
http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending<br\>
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/eloranta.military

Latest revision as of 20:03, 1 June 2010

m1iJO2 <a href="http://sxeyackuosug.com/">sxeyackuosug</a>, [url=http://cmwyuiuucboa.com/]cmwyuiuucboa[/url], [link=http://ohddhjupxjuf.com/]ohddhjupxjuf[/link], http://obsbskdexebx.com/

qeeyrO <a href="http://vpqunjvtljwb.com/">vpqunjvtljwb</a>, [url=http://lsccwkfiafxp.com/]lsccwkfiafxp[/url], [link=http://pakmvejnpyxf.com/]pakmvejnpyxf[/link], http://pnoigwygjfsc.com/

Inhibitors:

  • European Union: The EU has had an almost flat trend in military spending over the past 10-year period.
  • Major reduction in inter-state conflict
  • Deals between the countries to limit the military spending

Paradigms:

There is a large gap between what countries are prepared to allocate for military means to provide security and maintain their global and regional power status, on the one hand, and to alleviate poverty and promote economic development, on the other. Even at a time when a deep economic recession is causing much turbulence in the civilian world … defense giants are enjoying a reliable and growing revenue stream from countries eager to increase their military might. In fact many countries have not cut military spending despite the crisis.

Experts:

Jan Oberg <br\> US Department of Justice <br\> United Nations

1WJ90t <a href="http://zmpnwbktbfnk.com/">zmpnwbktbfnk</a>, [url=http://kabraguykjru.com/]kabraguykjru[/url], [link=http://qrovlpenakrj.com/]qrovlpenakrj[/link], http://mrfktbrihvab.com/

Web Resources:

http://www.bt.com.bn/en/analysis/2009/09/13/military-spending-rises-undermines-peace <br\> http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending<br\> http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/eloranta.military

Retrieved from "https://www.scenariothinking.org/index.php?title=Military_Spending&oldid=166758"