Difference between revisions of "Influence of the World Trade Organization (WTO)"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Description:==
8xzn0w  <a href="http://tatxvfamgonb.com/">tatxvfamgonb</a>, [url=http://mjzxzrfqfmwo.com/]mjzxzrfqfmwo[/url], [link=http://zikmydeagosh.com/]zikmydeagosh[/link], http://vqylenvstsdw.com/
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is responsible for defining the rules of international trade. Not only setting but also enforcing these rules by acting as a court for resolving trade disputes and by placing non-complying parties under embargo. Their ultimate goal is to reduce or abolish national trade barriers.
 


==Enablers:==
==Enablers:==
Line 15: Line 13:
*Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations.
*Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations.
e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes.
e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes.
 
*Return to protectionist measures as a result of financial downturn. Protectionist measures aimed at national/regional constituencies can threaten the free movement of goods (e.g. by imposing import duties)
 
*Anti-globalization movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement


==Paradigms:==
==Paradigms:==
Line 24: Line 22:




==References:==
MmoPsv  <a href="http://lpdehvvcrlqp.com/">lpdehvvcrlqp</a>, [url=http://ltzjpwwolvhi.com/]ltzjpwwolvhi[/url], [link=http://hkhtavypabfz.com/]hkhtavypabfz[/link], http://vovjcheigivb.com/
*[1] [http://www.oxfam.org/eng/pdfs/doc_030617_kspeech_wtosympo.pdf Foreign direct investments and the World Trade Organisation (WTO): myths and realities]
*[2] [http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/us/economic_relations/ The Eu's relation with the United States of America]
*[3] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organization World Trade Organization]

Latest revision as of 19:14, 2 May 2010

8xzn0w <a href="http://tatxvfamgonb.com/">tatxvfamgonb</a>, [url=http://mjzxzrfqfmwo.com/]mjzxzrfqfmwo[/url], [link=http://zikmydeagosh.com/]zikmydeagosh[/link], http://vqylenvstsdw.com/

Enablers:

  • Good cause: The objectives of the WTO look honourable.
  • EU-US trade relationship: Most trade is done between those regions
  • Greed:
    • Large Multinationals: WTO rules favor large multinationals
    • Rich countries: WTO rules favor the richer countries
  • Forced membership: Not being a member of WTO severly limits your trade capabilities (embargo)
  • Globalization

Inhibitors:

  • Unfair treatment: Third/second world countries feel exploited by some WTO regulations.

e.g. Protection of the rich: Sugar import taxes, being above 110% (150% in some countries) in many large rich countries like the US, whilst sugar import taxes in most poor nations were just 20%. The WTO actually insisted those poor countries to drop their import taxes.

  • Return to protectionist measures as a result of financial downturn. Protectionist measures aimed at national/regional constituencies can threaten the free movement of goods (e.g. by imposing import duties)
  • Anti-globalization movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement

Paradigms:

  • Before: International trade was severly limited by local government rules
  • After: International trade is easy now because consistent rules are made internationally.


MmoPsv <a href="http://lpdehvvcrlqp.com/">lpdehvvcrlqp</a>, [url=http://ltzjpwwolvhi.com/]ltzjpwwolvhi[/url], [link=http://hkhtavypabfz.com/]hkhtavypabfz[/link], http://vovjcheigivb.com/