Difference between revisions of "Climate Change Negotiations"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
[[Rachit Tayal]]<br>
[[Rachit Tayal]]<br>


== Scenario presentation feedback==
5 scenarios are too much you need to bring it down to 4
Use stories not tell what it is there, you are at times close to stories
"oil is at the brink of finishing" better to be specific
Like the introduction to g20 forum- nice shift
Good scenarios - well organized but what about business leading, cities leading?
= Numbers That Matter Presentation =
= Numbers That Matter Presentation =


Line 41: Line 34:
*;[[G20]]
*;[[G20]]
:''Multilateral Agreement through G20''
:''Multilateral Agreement through G20''
*;[[Two driving all]]
:''A bilateral agreement pushes the other nations''
*;[[A Lost Purpose]]
*;[[A Lost Purpose]]
:''Negotiations succeed but earth dies''
:''Negotiations succeed but earth dies''
Line 108: Line 99:
== Environmental Driving Forces ==  
== Environmental Driving Forces ==  
1. [[Greenhouse gas increase]]<br>
1. [[Greenhouse gas increase]]<br>
2. [http://www.scenariothinking.org/wiki/index.php/Catastrophes_-_Acts_of_God Catastrophes - Acts of God]<br>
2. [[Catastrophes_-_Acts_of_God|Catastrophes - Acts of God]]<br>


== Political Driving Forces ==  
== Political Driving Forces ==  

Revision as of 23:10, 5 October 2010